Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Journal of New Results in Science (JNRS) is an Online, Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access journal that aims to contribute to the progress and application of scientific discoveries by publishing Original Research Papers, Review articles that are not published or not being considered for publication elsewhere.

Journal of New Results in Science (JNRS) is a multidisciplinary journal that accepts original research articles written in English in

Mathematics and Statistics,
Natural Science,
Engineering Science,
Agricultural Science.

Writing Rules

20210501_JNRS_Template

20210501_JNRS_Template_LaTeX

20210501_JNRS_Template_Word

20210321_JNRS_Copyright_Form

Response Letter (Sample 1)

Response Letter (Sample 2)

The peer-review process is summarized as follows:

1. After a manuscript is submitted to the journal, an Editor is assigned to process it.

2. Editor produces a similarity report of the submission, which excludes Sources less than 1% and Bibliography, on iThenticate and uploads this report to the system for Reviewers to consider the report during the review.
a. The manuscript is rejected if the similarity rate (SR) is greater than 50%.
b. If 35% < SR < 50%, Editor checks the manuscript for plagiarism and whether it complies with the JNRS’s style guide and the required sections Abstract, Introduction, and Conclusion are included in the paper. Editor then requests Author to resubmit it as SR reduced to 35% or less. If either or both of the above cases exist(s), then Author is required to reformat the paper following the style guide and/or to include the missing section(s).
c. If SR ≤ 35%, Editor checks the manuscript for plagiarism and whether it complies with the JNRS’s style guide and the required sections Abstract, Introduction, and Conclusion are included in the paper. If Editor detects a likely case of plagiarism or realizes incongruence with the style guide and/or an absent/incomplete section, then Author is required to revise the manuscript before resubmission.

3. If required, Editor corresponds with Author until the article is ready for review.
If Author does not accept to resubmit the manuscript, the manuscript is rejected.
If Author has failed to duly satisfy the listed requests, the manuscript is rejected.

4. If Editor assigns an Area Editor,
a. Area Editor appoints at least four reviewers, two of which are proposed by Author.
b. Area Editor judges Reject, Minor revision, or Major Revision based on reviewers’ comments. If the decision is Reject, Area Editor notifies Editor of the decision.
If Author does not accept to revise the manuscript, the manuscript is rejected.
If Author has failed to upload the revised version and the compulsory files by the due date, the manuscript is rejected.
c. When the Minor Revision is completed, Area Editor reviews the revised paper and the accompanying response letter. Area Editor then notifies Editor of the decision.
d. When the Major Revision is completed, Area Editor forwards the revised paper and the accompanying response letter to Reviewers. Area Editor notifies Editor of the decision made based on the reviewers’ comments.

If Editor does not assign an Area Editor,
a. Editor appoints at least four reviewers, two of which are proposed by Author.
b. Editor judges Reject, Minor Revision, or Major Revision based on reviewers’ comments.
If Author does not accept to revise the manuscript, the manuscript is rejected.
If Author has failed to upload the revised version and the compulsory files by the due date, the manuscript is rejected.
c. When the Minor Revision is completed, Editor reviews the revised paper and the accompanying response letter. Editor then notifies Author of the decision.
d. When the Major Revision is completed, Editor forwards the revised paper and the accompanying response letter to Reviewers. Editor then notifies Author of the decision made based on the reviewers’ comments.

5. Editor completes the process by forwarding the accepted manuscript to Layout Editor, Proofreading (Language) Editor, and Production Editor.

Workflow Settings

Additional time given for all assigned users, when Editor extends the due date 7 Days

Time given to make an action when a new submission arrives before becoming overdue 10 Days

Time given for Editor to assign an Editor in "checked" status before becoming overdue 10 Days

Time given for the assigned Editor to take an action in "With Editor" status before becoming overdue 10 Days

Time given for the assigned editors to take an action in "Ready for Decision" status before becoming overdue 10 Days

Time given for Editor to make a decision before becoming overdue 10 Days

Time given for the assigned Editor to make the article to be ready for publishing, after the article is accepted before becoming overdue 21 Days

Time given for the Copyeditor, Statistics editor, Layout editor, and Proofreader to complete the task before becoming overdue 21 Days

Time given for the author to answer the requested task i.e resubmission or revision requested before becoming overdue 7 Days

Time given for the author to take action before becoming overdue 21 Days

Time given for the reviewer(s) to respond to the invitation before becoming overdue 7 Days

Time given for the reviewer to review the article after accepting the invitation before becoming overdue 21 Days

Allowed Article Types

Research Article and Review

Submission Checklists

All Authors have read and approved the most recent version of the paper.

The docx file has been uploaded as a Supporting File. / The tex file has been uploaded as a Latex Source File.

The paper (Full Text) and the Copyright Form are in pdf format.

The Authors' title has not been included in any personal information.

All the Figures have been uploaded since the paper format is "tex". / Any Figures have not been uploaded if since the paper format is "docx".

The paper has been prepared using JNRS’s template.

The paper's reference-excluded similarity rate by iThenticate or Turnitin is 35% or less.

Any abbreviation has not taken part in the authors' names and surnames.

Submission last step confirm text

The manuscript has been prepared using JNRS’s template.

The manuscript’s reference-excluded similarity rate by iThenticate or Turnitin is 35% or less.

My/our title(s) has not been included in any personal information, such as Prof, Mr, and Dr.

Any abbreviation has not taken part in my/our name(s) and surname(s).

The reviewers we suggest are not co-authors with us and not our colleagues in the same university, our master's advisors, PhD supervisors, or students (current or old).

Necessary Files (When submitting the paper)

Full-Text File The manuscript (pdf)

Copyright Form The copyright form (pdf)

Latex Source File The manuscript (tex) OR Supporting file The manuscript (docx)

Figures For only LaTeX (pdf, png, etc.)

Supporting file(if any) For only LaTeX (bib)

Necessary Files (After revisions)

Full-Text File The revised manuscript (pdf)

Latex Source File The revised manuscript (tex) OR Supporting file The revised manuscript (docx)

Figures for only LaTeX (pdf, png, etc.)

Response to Reviewers The response letter (pdf)

INFORMATION TO AUTHORS

Preparing the manuscript

Manuscripts should be typeset, preferably using the LATEX typesetting system. Manuscripts written in word format are also acceptable. Authors should prepare the article using the Journal's templates. The journal template for your manuscript in text or word form can be downloaded on the journal homepage.

All papers should include:

The title page should contain the title of the paper, running title less than 60 characters, full names of the authors (no degrees), affiliations addresses and e-mail addresses of all authors. Authors are also required to submit their Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID)’s which can be obtained from http://orcid.org as their URL address in the format http://orcid.org/xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx. Please indicate the corresponding author.

Abstract The manuscript must be accompanied by a brief abstract, no longer than 300 words. It should make minimal use of mathematical symbols and displayed formulae. The abstract should be written entirely justified and in 9 pt. The abstract should not contain any non-common abbreviations.

Keywords should represent the paper. Keywords should be written in 9 pt italics. The first letter of the keywords should be capitalized. The paper may contain a maximum of six keywords.

Subject Classification (2020) with primary (and secondary) subject classification codes.

Math Formulae Formulas should be numbered consecutively in parentheses ( ) that have to be displayed separately from the text. Math equations also have to be submitted as editable text and not as images.

Tables should have a short descriptive title and should be numbered consecutively in the order of appearance in the text. The titles of the tables should be written above the table.

Figures should be prepared in a digital form suitable for direct reproduction, preferably at a resolution of 300 dpi or higher, sized to fit a journal page, and in EPS, TIFF or JPEG format. Figures should have a short descriptive title and should be numbered consecutively in the order of appearance in the text. The position of each figure in the text should be indicated. The titles of the figures should be written under the figure.

Each page of the manuscript should be numbered, and the page numbers should be on the top right of the page.

Authors Contribution Statement and Declaration of Competing Interests should be given at the end of the manuscript before the references.

Bibliographic references should be listed in the order of appearance in the manuscript and numerical order at the end of the manuscript, each numbered by a number between square brackets. The following information should be provided for references to journals: names of authors, the full title of the article, the full name of the journal, volume, year of publication, and range of page numbers.

Submissions All manuscripts should be submitted electronically via our online submission system. The author who submitted the article for publication will be denoted as a corresponding author. He/She manages all communication and correspondence with the JNRS regarding the article. To submit a manuscript, you first need to login to the

https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/login

Website. If you do not have an account, you can register by clicking.

https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/register

The full text of the manuscripts should be submitted in PDF form. The authors are also asked to submit the Copyright Form, which can be downloaded on the journal homepage.

In the submission process, the authors are asked to give a list of potential reviewers. The authors should suggest at least two potential reviewers with full names, universities, and e-mail addresses. Proposed reviewers must be experienced researchers in the related area. Besides, these potential reviewers must not be co-authors, advisors, students, etc., of the authors. Please be aware that the assigned editor doesn't have to use the list of recommended nominations.

Plagiarism With the manuscript's submission, the authors declare that the article is clean in terms of plagiarism. The legal and ethical responsibility of the article belongs to the author(s). Author(s) also accept that the manuscript may go through a plagiarism check using plagiarism detection software. For a manuscript to be accepted from 2021, the similarity rate excluded its references should be a maximum of 35%.

Peer Review Policy All submitted manuscripts are subjected to the initial editor screening for ensuring editorial appropriateness and technical correctness. If a submitted article is within the scope of the journal and meets minimum editorial standards, an assigned editor initiates the review process. Each manuscript is undergone rigorous single-blind peer review by expert referees under the direction of the editor. Editor seek for at least two peer reviewers to evaluate the article before making a decision to accept. If one of the reviewers decides on major revision, the paper is sent back to reviewers as the journal policy after necessary changes made by the corresponding author. If a reviewer rejects the paper, the editor has the right to send it to another reviewer or reject the publication directly.

After Acceptance On acceptance of the paper, authors will be asked to send a text or word file(s) by e-mail to the Editorial Office.

Before publication, the galley proof is always sent to the author for correction. Thus it is solely the author's responsibility for any typographical mistakes which occur in their article as it appears in the journal.

Manuscripts are published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Journal Publishing Policy

Journal of New Results in Science is published on the ULAKBIM Journal platform with the "Refereed Journal" status. The journal is published three issues (April, August, and December) per year in electronic form.

The journal publishes original English studies in Mathematics and Statistics, Natural Science, Engineering Science, and Agricultural Science.

Manuscripts sent to the journal are directed to the relevant field editor after the editor and assistant editor review. According to the approval of the field editor, the manuscript will go through a single-blind peer-review process.

No fee is charged for the articles, book reviews, etc., published in the Journal of New Results in Science, and also, the journal does not pay any fees to authors.

Researches should be prepared by ethical rules, and citations in the manuscript should be indicated.

The arguments expressed in the published manuscripts do not represent the journal's views; it is the author's responsibility (s).

Copyright

Authors are obliged to fill and send a "Copyright Form" for the journal's manuscripts.

Publication Ethics

The Journal of New Results in Science's publication process is based on the unbiased production, improvement, and sharing of information using scientific methods.

The publication ethics and open access policy of the Journal of New Results in Science require that all stakeholders of the publication process comply with ethical principles in line with the guidelines and policies (For example, "Publication Ethics Committee (COPE) Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors;" Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors "and" COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors") published by the Publication Ethics Committee (Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE) on open access.

In situations such as manipulating and distorting the data used in the articles and using make-up data are detected, this situation will be officially reported to the institutions of the author(s), and the manuscript will be rejected. The journal has the right to request the output files of the authors' analysis results according to the feedback given by the editors and/or referees.

Publisher's Ethical Responsibilities

Journal of New Results in Science is in the public interest and non-profit. The editorial board of the journal consists of a chief editor, an assistant editor and field editors. A new member is appointed to replace the leaving member. According to the manuscript's subject, when necessary, the editor may send manuscripts to faculty members who are not members of the editorial board and have at least a PhD degree to be reviewed as field editors. In a year, the number of articles in which Editors are its Authors/Co-Authors cannot be more than 1/5 of the total number of articles published in the year.

The Responsibilities of the Journal Editorial Board

The editorial board is responsible for every manuscript submitted to the journal, and the editorial board is aware of this responsibility.

The editorial board strives to improve the journal and increase its publication quality continuously.

The editorial board ensures that journal policies such as publication, blind review, review process, ethical principles are determined and implemented.

The editorial board is responsible for taking measures regarding intellectual property rights, unscientific, unethical behaviours, and plagiarism during manuscripts and journals.

The editorial board carries out the responsibility of appointing an expert referee for the manuscripts sent to the journal.

Ethical Responsibilities of Editorial Board

While deciding on the publication of manuscripts, editors take care that the manuscripts are original and contribute to the scientific literature.

When editors make decisions about the manuscripts, they consider the original value of the manuscripts, their contribution to the field, the validity and reliability of the research method, the clarity of the language, and the journal's purpose and scope.

Editors implement the policies of blind review and review process, which are among the journal's publishing policies, keep the identity information of the referees confidential, and ensure that each manuscript is reviewed objectively and in time.

Editors send the manuscripts by taking into account the editors and referees' field of expertise, and they support the impartial and independent review.

Editors pay attention to an unbiased review of the manuscript. Editors strive to ensure the diversity of the referee committee and the constant change of the committee.

Editors ensure the protection of personal data in reviewed manuscripts. Editors pay attention to protecting human rights in the manuscripts and care about documenting the participants' explicit consent. They reject the manuscripts when the authors do not have the ethics committee's approval related to the manuscripts' participants.

Editors take precautions against misconduct. When there are complaints about misconduct, they make an objective investigation and share the complaints' findings.

Editors consider the consistent criticism of the manuscripts published in the journal and give the right to reply to the author(s) for the criticism.

Editors examine the complaints submitted to the journal and make the necessary explanations.

Ethical Responsibilities of Referees

In the process of reviewing the manuscripts, the single-blind refereeing principle is applied. Referees cannot communicate directly with the authors. The manuscript review forms and the notes specified on the manuscript and requests for correction are conveyed to the author(s) by the editors through the journal management system. Referees who will review the manuscripts submitted to the Journal of New Results in Science should bear the following ethical responsibilities:

Referees should only accept manuscripts related to their field of expertise.

Referees should notice the neutrality and confidentiality of the review process. In case of a conflict of interest, referees should refuse to review the manuscripts and inform them.

Referees should review the manuscripts in constructive language by academic ethic principles and avoid personal comments containing insults and hostility.

The referees should review the manuscripts, which they accepted, within the time limit. The referees should give detailed reasons for acceptance or refusal.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

Author(s) should not send the manuscript they have published elsewhere or sent to be published elsewhere.

The manuscript sent by the author(s) should be distinctive.

Author(s) should refer (cite) to the manuscript sources in line with ethical principles. The names of people who do not contribute to the manuscript should not be mentioned as authors. It should not be suggested to change the order of the authors and to remove or add authors for the manuscript submitted for publication,

If information or data about the manuscript is requested from the author(s) during the review process, the author(s) should provide the editors' expected information.

The author(s) should provide the ethics committee's approval for the research that requires quantitative or qualitative data collection methods such as experiments, questionnaires, scales, interviews, observations, and focus group studies. The document indicating the ethics committee decision should be uploaded to the system with the manuscript's application.

Notification of the Editor for the Unethical Cases

In case of encountering an unethical case regarding editors, referees, and authors or the manuscript in an early view or in the review process that does not comply with ethical principles, it should be reported to jnrs@gop.edu.tr e-mail address.

Obtaining Legal / Private Ethical Committee Approval

The articles related to the Principles of Ethics in the previous years in the EXPLANATION and DISCLOSURE Criteria for the TR Index Principles of Ethics were detailed with explanations in 2020. The issue of “including information about permission in the manuscript” was added to the criteria by assuming permission was obtained for studies requiring ethics committee approval in the field of research.

The researches that require ethical committee approval are as follows, and the forementioned permission must be obtained for the publication of such studies;

All kinds of research conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches require data collection from participants using a questionnaire, interview, focus group study, observation, experiment, interview techniques.

Use of humans and animals (including material/data) for experimental or other scientific purposes,

Clinical researches on humans,

Research on animals,

Retrospective studies by the law on the protection of personal data